BodyFat.Tips Desk

BodyFat.Tips Desk

The BodyFat.Tips Desk is the research and editorial operation behind BodyFat.Tips, a publication of TAK Marketing, LLC, part of the Omnishun information systems. It is a desk, not a person: no headshot, no invented bio, no borrowed credentials. Every verdict here is produced by reading the research itself rather than the press release, rating how strong the evidence actually is on a fixed four-point scale, tracing where the claim came from, and correcting in public when we get something wrong. Nobody pays us to reach a conclusion. This is journalism, not medical advice — take personal health questions to a clinician. How we work, in detail: bodyfat.tips/how-we-read-a-study/
0 of 2ageing-muscle trials that met their main goal (primary outcome): the two muscle trials in middle-aged and older adults, both of which reported gains on other measuresMAYBEPreliminary

Urolithin A Benefits: Both Ageing-Muscle Trials Missed Their Main Goal

Data graphic: the two trials of urolithin A for muscle in middle-aged and older adults, 88 adults aged 40 to 65 and 66 aged 65 to 90, each marked as missing the main goal it named in advance (peak power on a bike; the six-minute walk and a hand muscle's energy); beneath, the side measure people quote, hamstring strength up 12% on 500 mg against 9.8% down on the dummy pill; beside them the figure 0 of 2

Both trials of urolithin A for muscle in middle-aged and older adults, paid for by the supplement's maker, missed their main outcome. The 12% leg-strength gain was a side measure, beside a dummy-pill group whose hamstrings got 9.8% weaker. Rated Preliminary.

2 of 7randomised trials against steady walking that report a test of aerobic fitness found intervals significantly ahead: the 2007 trial and the Danish trial; a Thai trial's abstract reports a bigger rise with intervals but no test between the groups, and a 2017 pooling's calculation for it was not significant; four found no significant difference or the same gains; in Seoul intervals were ahead on a stepping test only, and Tokyo's results we read do not include fitnessMAYBEPreliminary

Japanese Walking: It Beat Steady Walking in 2007. Later Trials Split.

Data graphic: seven randomised trials comparing interval walking with steady walking on aerobic fitness, one marker each: significantly ahead in Japan in 2007 and in Denmark; ahead by its abstract, with no test between the groups, in Thailand; no significant difference or the same gains in Perth, Tokushima, Canada and Italy; beside them the figure 2 of 7

Interval walking beat steady walking on fitness, leg strength and blood pressure in the 2007 Japanese trial behind the trend, which analysed 42 of its 87 interval walkers. A Danish trial of 12 people a group agreed on fitness. Seven smaller trials since, by other universities, found it ahead on some measures and level on others, and poolings of interval training of every kind in type 2 diabetes put intervals slightly ahead on fitness and split on blood sugar.

34,601adults in a placebo-controlled winter trial, 17,278 of them on cod liver oil and 17,323 on corn oil; colds, other respiratory infections and Covid were not reducedNOUnsupported

Cod Liver Oil Benefits: It Helped End Rickets. In a Winter Trial of 34,601 Adults, It Did Not Reduce Colds or Covid.

Data graphic: in a winter trial of 34,601 Norwegian adults, 22.9% of the 17,278 given a daily teaspoon of cod liver oil and 22.1% of the 17,323 given corn oil reported at least one respiratory infection; beside them the figure 34,601

Cod liver oil's vitamin D helped end rickets. As a supplement for well-fed adults, the biggest trial of it we found, 34,601 Norwegians over a winter, half of them on cod liver oil and half on corn oil, found it did not reduce colds, other respiratory infections or Covid. The joint trials are small and split, and the vitamin A in a teaspoon ran from 40 to 4,000 micrograms across the labels we tallied.

29% v 10%fall in free testosterone over 30 days on spearmint tea against chamomile tea, 41 women with PCOS; the difference was not significant (p = 0.06); our arithmetic from a Cochrane review's figuresMAYBEPreliminary

Spearmint Tea Benefits: Free Testosterone Dipped in Two Small Studies of Women. We Found No Acne Study of the Tea

Data graphic: over 30 days in women with PCOS, free testosterone fell about 29% on spearmint tea (21 women) and about 10% on chamomile tea (20 women); the gap between the teas was not significant (p = 0.06); beside them the figures 29% v 10%

Free testosterone fell in two small studies of women with excess hair who drank spearmint tea. In the one randomised hormone trial we could read, against chamomile tea, the gap was not significant and doctor-scored hair did not differ. We found no study that gave people the tea, or spearmint alone, and measured acne.

2.1 vs 1.4mmHg off the top blood-pressure number, green and black tea each against a control, in a 2014 pooling of 21 longer trials (14 green, 7 black; the control a dummy drink or water in all 7 black and 8 green trials, a weaker green tea or no tea in 6); the gap between the teas was not significant (P = 0.33)MAYBEPreliminary

Black Tea vs Green Tea: Green Has Nearly 5 Times the Catechins, No Clear Winner in Trials

Data graphic: in a 2014 pooling of the longer trials, each against a control, green tea lowered the top blood-pressure number by 2.1 mmHg (range 1.2 to 2.9, 14 trials) and black tea by 1.4 (range 0.4 to 2.4, 7 trials); the gap between the teas was not statistically significant; beside them the figures 2.1 vs 1.4

Green tea carries nearly five times the catechins of black, by USDA measurements. But in trials that gave people one or the other, cholesterol came out level over four weeks. A six-month trial set each tea against a dummy tea, never against each other: black tea's fall in blood pressure was significant only in women, a subgroup result, and green tea's change was not significant in either sex. Pooled trials put each tea at a point or two off the top blood-pressure number.

98 vs 123glycaemic index of plain porridge oats and of cornflakes with the same carbohydrate, each scored against a standard of wholemeal bread with cottage cheese at 100, in a 1983 test in which six and seven adults with diabetes ate them; the two were not tested against each other, and white bread scored 102MOSTLYSupported

Is Oatmeal Good for Diabetics? Less Processed Oats Beat Refined Cereal; Instant Doesn’t

Data graphic: glycaemic index in adults with diabetes in a 1983 test, against wholemeal bread with cottage cheese at 100: porridge oats 98, white bread 102, cornflakes 123; the paper did not test porridge against cornflakes directly; beside them the figures 98 vs 123

Mostly yes. Next to refined breakfast cereals with the same carbohydrate, less processed oats raised blood sugar less, mostly in tests of people without diabetes; next to an omelette they raised it more, and instant oats kept little of the edge. The claim that oatmeal lowers A1C rests mostly on one oat-company trial with a whole diet attached.

1.4 lbmore weight lost on green tea extracts and catechin drinks than on a dummy, averaged over 38 short trials (0.64 kg); in 237 women drawn from those who finished a year of strong decaffeinated extract or a dummy, 0.6 lb against 0.3 lbMAYBEPreliminary

Does Green Tea Help You Lose Weight? About 1.4 lb in Short Extract Trials, Less in the Best-Run Ones

Data graphic: six pooled estimates of extra weight lost on green tea against a dummy, with their ranges: 1.4 lb across 38 short extract trials, 1.6 lb and 2.7 lb in two other poolings, 2.1 lb in a 2012 review, 0.9 lb in its three trials best guarded against bias and 0.09 lb in its six outside Japan, both ranges including no difference; in a year of decaffeinated extract, 0.6 lb against 0.3 lb; beside them the figure 1.4 lb

Green tea extracts and catechin drinks took off about 1.4 lb more than a dummy, averaged over 38 short trials. The trials best guarded against bias could not tell green tea from a placebo, and in 237 women drawn from those who finished a year of strong decaffeinated extract or a dummy, the extract came to 0.6 lb, against 0.3 lb. The famous calorie burn is real, small, and plain caffeine did about as much.

140older adults with a raised marker of B12 shortfall, their median B12 level inside the normal range, randomised to four weekly B12 shots or salt-water shots (140): symptom scores, daily tiredness among them, compared in 134, did not differ significantly at three months (2001)NOUnsupported

B12 Shot Benefits: Real for Deficiency. Energy: Dummy Shots Kept Up. Weight: No Published Trial

Data graphic: two blocks of 70 dots, 140 older adults with a raised marker of B12 shortfall randomised to four weekly B12 shots or salt-water shots in a 2001 Danish trial; symptom scores, compared in 134 at three months, did not differ significantly; beside them the figure 140

B12 shots are a real treatment for people who cannot absorb B12. Sold for energy and weight loss to people who are not short of it, they have little behind them: in the placebo-controlled trials we found, dummy shots did about as well, and the one registered weight-loss trial we found never posted results.

−0.24BMI points per doubling of CRP, estimated from a CRP-raising gene variant in 21,836 Danish adults; not statistically significant (range 0.58 lower to 0.11 higher)NOUnsupported

Can Inflammation Cause Weight Gain? Genetic Studies Point the Arrow From Fat to Inflammation

Data graphic: in a genetic study of 21,836 Danish adults, a gene variant that raises CRP went with 0.24 BMI points less per doubling of CRP, a range from 0.58 lower to 0.11 higher that includes no difference; a variant that raises BMI went with more CRP; beside them the figure -0.24

Extra body fat raises inflammation markers, in genetic studies and weight-loss trials. The reverse did not hold up in the genetic studies of CRP, and anti-inflammatory drugs mostly did not take weight off: diacerein did in one small trial and two pills for psoriasis and lung disease do as a side effect, while one added 3.0 lb against a dummy pill in a 48-week trial of 286 adults with type 2 diabetes.

21%growth of one abdominal muscle on MRI in nine women after nine months of Pilates, with no comparison group; six hip and lower-back muscles in the same women did not grow significantlyMAYBEPreliminary

Does Pilates Build Muscle? Not Clearly. Past 60, It Builds Everyday Strength

Data graphic: in one MRI study of nine inactive women with no comparison group, the main abdominal muscle's volume rose 21% after 36 weeks of Pilates, while the glutes showed a small change that was not significant; three pooled lean-mass estimates found no clear gain; beside them the figure 21%

Pilates makes people stronger than doing nothing, most clearly past 60 and on practical tests such as standing up from a chair. Whether it adds muscle is less clear: three lean-mass poolings found no significant gain, and on MRI nine months grew the abs, while the hips barely changed. Against weights, it matched or lost on strength.