Confidence tier Preliminary

Early, small, conflicting, or animal-only. Not actionable alone.

2.8 mg/dLfall in fasting blood sugar over 12 weeks on 2.4 g of moringa leaf a day, against a 2.0 mg/dL rise on a dummy pill, in a double-blind trial of 65 adults with prediabetes (Madrid, 2021)MAYBEPreliminary

Moringa Benefits: A Nutritious Leaf With Small, Mixed Blood Sugar Trials

Data graphic: fasting blood sugar over 12 weeks in a Madrid trial of 65 adults with prediabetes, 103.4 to 100.6 mg/dL on moringa and 104.2 to 106.2 on a dummy pill; beside them the figure 2.8 mg/dL

Moringa leaf is genuinely nutritious, gram for gram. Sold as a blood sugar remedy, it put fasting sugar a few mg/dL below placebo in some small trials and not in others, and a 2025 pooling of randomised trials found no significant difference. Weight did not move; the breast milk evidence is small and mixed; pregnancy and contaminated powders are the real cautions.

24% lowerdeath rate from heart disease and stroke, men eating the most natto against men eating none (hazard ratio 0.76; women 0.79, 21% lower), 92,915 Japanese adults; an association, not a testMAYBEPreliminary

Natto Benefits: Linked to Fewer Heart and Stroke Deaths. No Trial We Found Has Tested It

Data graphic: in a Japanese study of 92,915 adults followed for 14.8 years, people eating the most natto against none had death rates from heart disease and stroke 0.76 times as high in men (range 0.65 to 0.90) and 0.79 in women (0.65 to 0.95), both clear of the no-difference line; beside them the figure 24% lower

In two large Japanese studies, people who ate the most natto died of heart disease and stroke at about a fifth to a quarter lower rate than people who ate little or none. That is an association, not a test. The enzyme pill sold from natto, nattokinase, lowered blood pressure a few points in two small trials tied to its makers but not significantly in two others, and in its three-year trial did not significantly slow artery thickening. If you take warfarin, natto's vitamin K works against your drug.

181people analysed in the biggest trial we found to measure inflammation and oxidation markers: three months of electrolysed hydrogen water or filtered water from look-alike machines; CRP, IL-6, TNF and five other blood and urine markers, all side outcomes, were not significantly different between the groupsMAYBEPreliminary

Hydrogen Water Benefits: Small, Mixed Shifts in Blood Markers, and No Significant Win in the Three Biggest Trials

Data graphic: one dot per person in a 2024 Japanese trial of 181 adults with or near metabolic syndrome, 91 on electrolysed hydrogen water and 90 on filtered water for three months; eight inflammation and oxidation markers, all side outcomes, none significantly different between the groups; beside them the figure 181

Hydrogen water is real: the gas is in fresh water, and it leaks out within hours. Small trials found small, mixed shifts in blood markers of inflammation and oxidation; the three biggest, of 700, 200 and 178 people, found no significant difference on their main outcome.

196 vs 248rise in coronary calcium score over two years on K2 with D3 vs a dummy pill, 398 people with heavy calciumMAYBEPreliminary

Vitamin D3 and K2: Artery Calcium Still Rose, a Fifth Slower in the Largest Trial

Data graphic: in a two-year Danish trial of 398 people with heavy calcium in the heart's arteries, the calcium score rose by 196 units on vitamin K2 with D3 and by 248 on a dummy pill; beside them the figure 196 vs 248

Sold to steer calcium into bone and out of the arteries. In the largest trial of the pair, 398 people with heavy artery calcium, it still built up, about a fifth more slowly than on a dummy pill; in a trial of 365 men it did not build up significantly more slowly. On warfarin, K2 is a drug interaction.

0 of 6seed-cycling studies we found that compared the rotation with a dummy or with the same seeds eaten every day. All six reported improvements; five were in women with PCOS, and each added a diet, a drug, exercise or supplements, or had no comparison groupMAYBEPreliminary

Does Seed Cycling Work? A Few Small Studies, Mostly in PCOS, Lean Its Way. None We Found Tested the Timing.

Data graphic: the six studies in people under the name seed cycling, of 290, 60, 45, 40, 30 and 1 people, each marked as reporting improvements; beneath, an empty row for studies that set the rotation against the same seeds eaten every day or against a dummy; beside them the figure 0 of 6

Not yet shown. The studies of seed cycling are few and small, nearly all in women with PCOS, and each mixed the seeds with a diet, a drug, exercise or a herb, or had no comparison group. None we found compared the rotation with the same seeds eaten all month.

0 of 2ageing-muscle trials that met their main goal (primary outcome): the two muscle trials in middle-aged and older adults, both of which reported gains on other measuresMAYBEPreliminary

Urolithin A Benefits: Both Ageing-Muscle Trials Missed Their Main Goal

Data graphic: the two trials of urolithin A for muscle in middle-aged and older adults, 88 adults aged 40 to 65 and 66 aged 65 to 90, each marked as missing the main goal it named in advance (peak power on a bike; the six-minute walk and a hand muscle's energy); beneath, the side measure people quote, hamstring strength up 12% on 500 mg against 9.8% down on the dummy pill; beside them the figure 0 of 2

Both trials of urolithin A for muscle in middle-aged and older adults, paid for by the supplement's maker, missed their main outcome. The 12% leg-strength gain was a side measure, beside a dummy-pill group whose hamstrings got 9.8% weaker. Rated Preliminary.

2 of 7randomised trials against steady walking that report a test of aerobic fitness found intervals significantly ahead: the 2007 trial and the Danish trial; a Thai trial's abstract reports a bigger rise with intervals but no test between the groups, and a 2017 pooling's calculation for it was not significant; four found no significant difference or the same gains; in Seoul intervals were ahead on a stepping test only, and Tokyo's results we read do not include fitnessMAYBEPreliminary

Japanese Walking: It Beat Steady Walking in 2007. Later Trials Split.

Data graphic: seven randomised trials comparing interval walking with steady walking on aerobic fitness, one marker each: significantly ahead in Japan in 2007 and in Denmark; ahead by its abstract, with no test between the groups, in Thailand; no significant difference or the same gains in Perth, Tokushima, Canada and Italy; beside them the figure 2 of 7

Interval walking beat steady walking on fitness, leg strength and blood pressure in the 2007 Japanese trial behind the trend, which analysed 42 of its 87 interval walkers. A Danish trial of 12 people a group agreed on fitness. Seven smaller trials since, by other universities, found it ahead on some measures and level on others, and poolings of interval training of every kind in type 2 diabetes put intervals slightly ahead on fitness and split on blood sugar.

29% v 10%fall in free testosterone over 30 days on spearmint tea against chamomile tea, 41 women with PCOS; the difference was not significant (p = 0.06); our arithmetic from a Cochrane review's figuresMAYBEPreliminary

Spearmint Tea Benefits: Free Testosterone Dipped in Two Small Studies of Women. We Found No Acne Study of the Tea

Data graphic: over 30 days in women with PCOS, free testosterone fell about 29% on spearmint tea (21 women) and about 10% on chamomile tea (20 women); the gap between the teas was not significant (p = 0.06); beside them the figures 29% v 10%

Free testosterone fell in two small studies of women with excess hair who drank spearmint tea. In the one randomised hormone trial we could read, against chamomile tea, the gap was not significant and doctor-scored hair did not differ. We found no study that gave people the tea, or spearmint alone, and measured acne.

2.1 vs 1.4mmHg off the top blood-pressure number, green and black tea each against a control, in a 2014 pooling of 21 longer trials (14 green, 7 black; the control a dummy drink or water in all 7 black and 8 green trials, a weaker green tea or no tea in 6); the gap between the teas was not significant (P = 0.33)MAYBEPreliminary

Black Tea vs Green Tea: Green Has Nearly 5 Times the Catechins, No Clear Winner in Trials

Data graphic: in a 2014 pooling of the longer trials, each against a control, green tea lowered the top blood-pressure number by 2.1 mmHg (range 1.2 to 2.9, 14 trials) and black tea by 1.4 (range 0.4 to 2.4, 7 trials); the gap between the teas was not statistically significant; beside them the figures 2.1 vs 1.4

Green tea carries nearly five times the catechins of black, by USDA measurements. But in trials that gave people one or the other, cholesterol came out level over four weeks. A six-month trial set each tea against a dummy tea, never against each other: black tea's fall in blood pressure was significant only in women, a subgroup result, and green tea's change was not significant in either sex. Pooled trials put each tea at a point or two off the top blood-pressure number.

1.4 lbmore weight lost on green tea extracts and catechin drinks than on a dummy, averaged over 38 short trials (0.64 kg); in 237 women drawn from those who finished a year of strong decaffeinated extract or a dummy, 0.6 lb against 0.3 lbMAYBEPreliminary

Does Green Tea Help You Lose Weight? About 1.4 lb in Short Extract Trials, Less in the Best-Run Ones

Data graphic: six pooled estimates of extra weight lost on green tea against a dummy, with their ranges: 1.4 lb across 38 short extract trials, 1.6 lb and 2.7 lb in two other poolings, 2.1 lb in a 2012 review, 0.9 lb in its three trials best guarded against bias and 0.09 lb in its six outside Japan, both ranges including no difference; in a year of decaffeinated extract, 0.6 lb against 0.3 lb; beside them the figure 1.4 lb

Green tea extracts and catechin drinks took off about 1.4 lb more than a dummy, averaged over 38 short trials. The trials best guarded against bias could not tell green tea from a placebo, and in 237 women drawn from those who finished a year of strong decaffeinated extract or a dummy, the extract came to 0.6 lb, against 0.3 lb. The famous calorie burn is real, small, and plain caffeine did about as much.