Category Uncategorized

6.13mg/dL further LDL drop than olive oilNOUnsupported

Is Canola Oil Bad For You? The Thing It’s Accused Of Was Bred Out Fifty Years Ago

A cartoon four-petalled canola flower on a stem, beside the figure 6.13

Canola is rapeseed bred low in erucic acid — the name literally means Canadian oil, low acid. The FDA ban people cite was against mustard oil, not this. Even in the rat studies the heart lesions were judged 'not related to erucic acid per se'. And in 13 head-to-head trials, canola lowered LDL more than olive oil did.

90%cut from the diet — arachidonic acid didn't moveNOUnsupported

Are Seed Oils Bad For You? Both Sides Are Quoting Half The Evidence

A cartoon bottle of cooking oil, part filled, beside the figure 90 percent

Cut dietary linoleic acid by 90% and tissue arachidonic acid doesn't move — the inflammation mechanism fails at step one. But the two recovered BMJ trials showed no mortality benefit and one showed higher deaths, which the reassurance articles never mention. Here is the whole file, including what's wrong with both halves.

60-80%of your creatine tank is already fullYESEstablished

How Much Creatine Should You Take? 3 To 5 Grams — And You’re Already Most Of The Way There

A cartoon measuring scoop heaped with powder, beside the figure 60 to 80 percent

On an ordinary diet your muscle creatine is already 60–80% saturated, and supplementing fills the rest. Which is why one biopsy study found a six-fold difference in response to the identical dose — the people who gained most started with the most room. Loading only changes how fast you arrive.

0laxative effect from 40 g of maltitolMOSTLYSupported

Are Sugar Alcohols Bad For You? The Real Problem Is Digestive

Four cartoon chocolate bars, the last one snapped short, beside the figure zero

Same trial, same 59 people, same 40-gram dose: lactitol caused severe symptoms across the board and maltitol caused no laxative effect at all. Both are labelled sugar alcohols. Europe's regulator set a limit on erythritol for diarrhoea — not clots — and refused to drop the warning label. And the erythritol and xylitol heart scares came from one dataset.

8people actually given erythritolMAYBEPreliminary

Is Erythritol Bad For You? The One Sweetener Worth Watching

A cartoon heap of coarse sweetener crystals, beside the figure 8

The 2023 study linking erythritol to heart attacks came with a real mechanism — more reactive platelets, more clotting in animals. But the cohorts measured erythritol in blood, not diet, and your body makes its own: plasma levels track metabolic disease and fall after weight loss. Marker or cause is genuinely unresolved.

9–14daily cans to exceed the safe limitNOUnsupported

Is Aspartame Bad For You? Two WHO Reports, One Headline

Two cartoon reports overlapping, one behind the other, beside the figure 9 to 14

On the same day in July 2023, IARC called aspartame 'possibly carcinogenic' — a hazard statement, third of four levels — and JECFA reaffirmed the safe daily intake, noting a 70 kg adult would need 9–14 cans of diet drink a day to exceed it. The press ran the first report. WHO's own nutrition director said safety is not a major concern at normal doses.

39stevia trials, against aspartame's 121MAYBEPreliminary

Is Stevia Bad For You? “Natural” Is Not a Safety Category

Cartoon serrated stevia leaf on a stem, beside the figure 39

The WHO guideline covers 'all synthetic and naturally occurring' sweeteners and names stevia in the same list as aspartame — natural is written out as an exemption on purpose. And stevia has about a third the randomised trial evidence of aspartame, so the confidence people feel about it is not coming from a deeper evidence base.