Ice Baths Work for Soreness — 52 Studies Say So. After Lifting, They Also Blunt Muscle Growth.

Ice baths work. That is not the interesting part.

Fifty-two studies have been pooled on this, and the answer is reasonably clear: twenty-four hours after a hard session, people who got into cold water have less muscle soreness, more muscular power, lower markers of muscle damage in their blood, and they feel more recovered. [1]

The interesting part is what it costs, and what else would have done the same job.

First, the good news, precisely

The best summary compared cold water immersion against simply resting, across 52 studies. [1] At 24 hours after high-intensity exercise, the cold group came out ahead on soreness, on power, on creatine kinase — an enzyme that leaks into your blood when muscle is damaged — and on how recovered they said they felt.

Two things did not improve, and they are worth knowing. There was no significant effect on recovery of strength after either type of exercise. And the analysis found that shorter, colder dips outperformed longer, milder ones — so the fifteen-minute endurance contest is not where the benefit is.

Second: a hot pack did the same job

This is the finding that should be far more famous than it is.

A separate review pooled 32 randomised trials in 1,098 people looking at delayed onset muscle soreness — the ache that arrives a day or two after unfamiliar training. It tested cold and heat. [2]

Cold worked, within the first 24 hours. So did heat — and the hot pack produced the largest effect of anything measured, on pain both within 24 hours and beyond it, where cold had run out.

The reviewers’ verdict on cold versus heat: “there was no significant difference between cold and heat group”. [2]

So the ache you are trying to fix responds about equally to a five-thousand-dollar plunge tub and a hot water bottle. One of those has an industry behind it.

Third, and this is the one that should change behaviour

In 2015, researchers took 21 men and had them strength train twice a week for twelve weeks. Identical programme. The only difference: after every session, half did ten minutes of cold water immersion and half did an active warm-down. [3]

Twelve weeks of lifting, with an ice bath after every session
What grew Warm-down group Ice bath group
Fast-twitch fibre size +17% no increase
Nuclei inside the fibres +26% no increase
Work capacity +19% no increase
Roberts et al., The Journal of Physiology 2015. Twenty-one men, twelve weeks, identical training. The only difference was ten minutes of cold water versus an active warm-down. A second study found the fibre effect but not the strength one — see below.

The warm-down group grew. The ice bath group substantially did not. Fast-twitch fibre size, the number of nuclei inside the muscle fibres, work capacity — all up in the active group, none of it up in the cold group.

The researchers also looked at what was happening in the hours afterwards, and found cold water suppressed the satellite cells and the signalling proteins that drive muscle growth. Their conclusion is unusually direct for a physiology paper: “The use of CWI as a regular post-exercise recovery strategy should be reconsidered.” [3]

A second study, and where it disagrees

A 2019 trial ran seven weeks of resistance training with cold water immersion after each session. [4] It agreed on the important bit: muscle fibre growth was attenuated, along with the anabolic signalling that produces it.

But it disagreed on strength. In that study, leg press strength improved similarly in both groups. Its authors make the distinction explicitly — blunted fibre growth “does not necessarily translate to impaired strength development” — while still concluding that post-exercise cold “should therefore be avoided if muscle hypertrophy is desired”. [4]

So: two studies, both finding less muscle growth, one finding less strength and one not. We are not going to average those. What they agree on is that if the goal is getting bigger, cold water after lifting works against you.

Which leaves a decision rather than a rule

This is one of the rare cases where the evidence gives you a genuinely useful if-then.

If the next performance matters more than the next adaptation — a tournament, a second match the same weekend, back-to-back sessions in pre-season — cold water is a real tool. That is exactly the situation the 52-study review was measuring.

If you are training to get bigger or stronger, the soreness IS the process. Cold water after lifting reduces the ache by damping the response that produces the gain. Do that habitually and you are paying for recovery with adaptation.

And if you simply want to hurt less tomorrow, a hot pack performed at least as well in the trials, costs nothing, and does not blunt anything.

The verdict

Supported — for recovery. Fifty-two studies agree that cold water reduces soreness and restores power a day after hard exercise, and the direction is not seriously in doubt.

It is Supported rather than Established because it does nothing for strength recovery, the soreness benefit does not survive past 24 hours, and heat matched it with no significant difference between them.

And the thing almost nobody is told: used routinely after resistance training, it measurably reduces the muscle growth you did the training for. The people who ran that study said the practice should be reconsidered. Ten years later, the tubs are selling better than ever.

Related: whether cold plunges burn fat (a different question, and a different answer), saunas, and tart cherry juice — the rest of the recovery aisle, checked. If the goal is actually growth, start with creatine and beta-alanine.

If you want to know what earns each rating, we wrote down how we read a study, and everything we have checked is in one place.

Sources
[1] Moore E, Fuller JT, Buckley JD, Saunders S, Halson SL, Broatch JR, et al. Impact of Cold-Water Immersion Compared with Passive Recovery Following a Single Bout of Strenuous Exercise on Athletic Performance in Physically Active Participants: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Meta-regression. Sports Medicine 2022;52(7):1667–1688. doi:10.1007/s40279-022-01644-9
[2] Wang Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Yan F, Han L, et al. Heat and cold therapy reduce pain in patients with delayed onset muscle soreness: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 randomized controlled trials. Physical Therapy in Sport 2021;48:177–187. doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2021.01.004
[3] Roberts LA, Raastad T, Markworth JF, Figueiredo VC, Egner IM, Shield A, et al. Post-exercise cold water immersion attenuates acute anabolic signalling and long-term adaptations in muscle to strength training. The Journal of Physiology 2015;593(18):4285–4301. doi:10.1113/jp270570
[4] Fyfe JJ, Broatch JR, Trewin AJ, Hanson ED, Argus CK, Garnham AP, et al. Cold water immersion attenuates anabolic signaling and skeletal muscle fiber hypertrophy, but not strength gain, following whole-body resistance training. Journal of Applied Physiology 2019;127(5):1403–1418. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00127.2019
The 8.2 million views figure is the combined view count of the fifteen most relevant videos returned for this term on 22 August 2026. A view count is evidence that a claim circulates, not evidence about muscle.